Garry Kasparov, a name synonymous with chess excellence, recently took to Twitter to answer an array of questions about the game. In this engaging session, he delved into various aspects of chess, offering insights that range from the psychological quirks of players to the strategic nuances of different pieces and openings.
One of the more quirky questions asked was about why chess players often point at pieces and squares with their middle fingers. Kasparov humorously suggested that this might require a psychologist’s insight, as he himself had never paid attention to this phenomenon. The jest highlighted the sometimes-overlooked idiosyncrasies that can become apparent in the intense focus of a chess game.
When asked to choose between a bishop and a knight, Kasparov provided a nuanced answer. Historically, both pieces are considered roughly equal in value. However, Bobby Fischer’s insight that a bishop might hold slightly more value (3.25 points) compared to a knight (3 points) was acknowledged by Kasparov. He noted that modern computer analyses often validate Fischer’s assessment, suggesting that bishops may indeed be more useful in many positions due to their long-range capabilities.
Kasparov affirmed the classical wisdom of developing all minor pieces before activating the queen. The queen, being the most powerful yet most vulnerable piece, must be deployed carefully. While there are exceptions where early queen development is natural, he advised beginners to adhere to the traditional rule to avoid premature attacks on their most valuable piece.
Castling, a critical move for king safety, was another topic of interest. Kasparov emphasized that moving the king to a safer position is paramount, even if it restricts the king’s mobility. He explained the strategic choice between castling short (safer but less ambitious) and castling long (riskier but potentially more rewarding), underscoring the balance between safety and aggression.
Kasparov’s preference for gambit openings like the Evans Gambit and the Benko Gambit revealed his appreciation for aggressive and dynamic play. He reminisced about notable victories using these openings, though he acknowledged that top-level players rarely employ gambits in serious matches due to the high level of preparation required by their opponents.
On the topic of endgames, Kasparov recommended Mark Dvoretsky’s book, "Dvoretsky’s Endgame Manual," as an essential resource. This book helps players of all levels improve their endgame skills, crucial for converting advantages into victories.
Controlling the center is fundamental in chess, yet Kasparov cautioned that it should not overshadow king safety. He provided examples where dominance of the center did not guarantee victory if the king was exposed. This balance between offense and defense is a recurring theme in chess strategy.
The impact of artificial intelligence on chess was another fascinating discussion point. Kasparov highlighted how computers, with their ability to analyze vast numbers of games, have reshaped our understanding of piece value and strategy. However, he also noted the limitations of AI, as chess remains a closed system with finite possibilities, unlike the open-ended complexities of real-world problems.
Addressing a light-hearted question about the knight’s unique movement, Kasparov explained that the distinct abilities of chess pieces contribute to the game’s intricate balance. The knight’s L-shaped move is a defining characteristic that adds to the strategic depth and historical richness of chess.
In closing, Kasparov expressed his appreciation for the diverse range of questions, from the highly technical to the delightfully simple. This diversity, he noted, is what makes chess a universal game, uniting players of all skill levels into a global family.
What do you think?
👍
😆
😍
😲
😡
😢
Email:
Address:
Ashwood Drive
Clubview
Centurion
Gauteng
RSA
© Chemcoolchess Privacy Policy
2025
